spelling_bee_sting
The New York Times has a daily puzzle called "Spelling Bee", which
lists 7 distinct letters, which are to be combined to form as many
words as possible. One letter is special, and must always be used
in each word. Words must be at least 4 letters long. Candidate
words are checked against a (hidden) dictionary. Some words are
excluded for being profane, racist or obscure.
There have been times when what seems a perfectly legitimate word
has been rejected. Sometimes a possible reason can be deduced,
but other times the ruling makes no sense. Moreover, a number of
words are accepted which seem irregular, obscure, or foreign.
- gogo, haha, hoho, nono, yoyo
-
I can't be proud of these, but Spelling Bee pretends to have
never heard of them.
- boho, bohos
-
I only guessed boho out of desperation, and was somewhat irked
that this shortening of "Bohemian" was accepted. The Spelling
Bee dictionary must think "boho" is strictly an adjective (but
it's not) and so it rejected my subsequent word "bohos".
- gonna, wanna
-
Sure, these are common representations of slurred pronunciations.
But are they words? Spelling Bee thinks so. Then what about
hadda, hafta, woulda, shoulda, coulda, dunno, kinda?
- llano
-
Spelling Bee thinks this is a word.
I only knew this was a possible word because the "Hints" menu
said that one word began with "LL". Given the choices "Olnaych",
I was able to figure out that it must be "llano"...which is a
Spanish word, but not one that I would say has worked its way into
English.
- coon
-
Spelling Bee rejects this, presumably for reasons of taste.
- halon
-
Spelling Bee thinks this is a NOT word, but it used to be
an important chemical component of fire extinguishers.
- monic
-
Spelling Bee thinks this is a NOT word. It is, at least to
math people, and Spelling Bee does accept "nonagon", which
is also a math word, but much more obscure.
- halloo
-
Spelling Bee thinks this is a NOT word. It is, at least to
English people.
- local, locally, nonlocal, nonlocally
-
Three of these are acceptable, and the last one is not.
Can you explain why? This suggests the dictionary is
really not consistent, or is too lazy to consider all
the possibilities.
Last modified on 04 September 2025.